Wednesday, December 3, 2008
Chap. 31
I may be showing my age a bit here but the first time I went through WMU we had huge mainframes that stored all the data from the classes that were taught. The computer stations were just keyboards and monitors and enough computing power to send information to the mainframe. All data was stored in one location; gee that sounds very much like the chapter we just read. As the technology was improved and components got smaller we had the boom in personal computers, where all the data was stored in one location except it was a very specific place with very limited ways to share information. Along comes the internet and we are back to the "mainframe concept" curiously called data farms where huge amounts of information are stored in one central location again. The difference is that this time the data needs to be "secure" and it can be manipulated and used by many different people inside an organization. In the small school district where I work the pricipals all have to put together an annual report for their building, much of the information is the same and some is specific to the building. With the school district data all stored in one central location the pricipals can access whatever they need to prepare their report. This also allows for the sharing of duties, for example, one person may be good at charts so they can make all the Excel charts for the district and another person can do the paragraph writing portion. Storing all the information in one location allow all the principals access to everything they need to produce the report.
Our school uses Study Island as a tool for kids to practice standard assessment test taking. This is program also uses central location data storage. Exactly where that data is stored I'm not sure but the program is internet based so the data is out there somewhere lurking in cyber space. Or perhaps it is stored on our in school servers and the program is accessed over the web. Regardless it is another example of data storage in one central location and access to the program can be from anywhere in the world.
The activity I liked best from this course was the lesson on screen casting. I believe I will be able to use this tool in the classes I teach, therefore it becomes a valuable asset to me and to my students. It will allow them another avenue for learning. As we all know some kids learning by hearing instructions, some by seeing things done, others by doing and trying an activity. The screen casts will allow me to add a different dimension to my students learning. If I store the information on a web site then they will have access to it for as long as they can remember the web site address. Another advantage I see is that the other technology teachers in the district will have access to the information. We can then update or add to our knowledge base as the need arises.
Monday, November 17, 2008
FotoFLexer
FotoFlexer is very easy to use and figure out even for a first time user. As a middle school teacher I feel this application would be used on a very limited basis if at all. In my school we take very few photos and do not display them electronically, perhaps an elementary teacher would put some animation to pictures and then post them with their online newsletter. I'm still not convinced teachers would take the time to play with the pictures. Now if you were posting personal pictures I can absolutely see using this application. It would be a very easy and fun way to spice up any picture at your disposal.
ZOHO review
I took a look at ZOHO applications. I can't imagine there is anything else you would need to do as a teacher that you could not do on ZOHO. I seems to have everything you would ever need. The word processor and spreadsheet look just like Microsoft Office, and really as a teacher you don't need a ton of bells and whistles, you need to put out a product that the kids or other teachers can read and use. The other part I liked was the online survey application. In our district we have a survey that we ask the parents to take at parent teacher conferences. This online application would save the teachers from complining all the data by hand, that would be a real time saver. We would also be able to put the data into the spreadsheet and make any charts that were needed for state reports. This would be a nice feature to have at our disposal.
Chapter 30
After reading Chapter 30 I've become aware that my students would be better served if I put some animation or screen casts into my teaching techniques. In my school district we have the computers pretty tightly regulated as to where the kids can and can not go. The issue becomes one of where I will store my visual aids so the students can actually see them. I'll have to investigate the possibility of making my own website that seems the best option at this point. I can then access it from home or at school when I want to make adjustments or changes. The students will also be able to work at home or at school this seems to be the ideal option. So what can I put on there?
The technology class that I teach has no text books, I really do not want to copy pages and hand them out to students as they tend to misplace them and that becomes wasteful. So currently I have written directions for them to follow as they explore the Microsoft Office products. If I put the information on a website, I could then include screen casts to enhance learning. At this point in time I do not allow audio to be used as the students would have all kinds of music playing. With the use of the screen cast I would need to get some ear phones so they could listen to the directions as well as see the instructions. These are all very do able. I believe it would make lessons easier for the students to follow and perhaps they would retain the information better. The only question that remains is if the school has blocked the use of free internet websites. I will be trying that very soon.
One other idea that the article brought up is that in any group of students there are many different learning styles, some are auditory, some manipulative, some visual, some a combination of all of these. The hard part for me the teacher is to get all of these learning styles into my teaching. Sometimes I feel that drawing pictures, or making projects is just a waste of time, but I need to remember that some students actually get something out of the experience. Others times I need to lecture and put examples on the board so the visual learner can see what I'm talking about. By putting some of the lessons on the computer and letting the students explore on their own I will be reaching another segment of my learning population. Again I sometimes question if doing work on the computers is actually reaching any one, the hard part to remember is that all students learn in different ways, and it is my job to present the material in as many different ways as possible to reach as many kids as possible. Computers is just another avenue for reaching some kids.
The technology class that I teach has no text books, I really do not want to copy pages and hand them out to students as they tend to misplace them and that becomes wasteful. So currently I have written directions for them to follow as they explore the Microsoft Office products. If I put the information on a website, I could then include screen casts to enhance learning. At this point in time I do not allow audio to be used as the students would have all kinds of music playing. With the use of the screen cast I would need to get some ear phones so they could listen to the directions as well as see the instructions. These are all very do able. I believe it would make lessons easier for the students to follow and perhaps they would retain the information better. The only question that remains is if the school has blocked the use of free internet websites. I will be trying that very soon.
One other idea that the article brought up is that in any group of students there are many different learning styles, some are auditory, some manipulative, some visual, some a combination of all of these. The hard part for me the teacher is to get all of these learning styles into my teaching. Sometimes I feel that drawing pictures, or making projects is just a waste of time, but I need to remember that some students actually get something out of the experience. Others times I need to lecture and put examples on the board so the visual learner can see what I'm talking about. By putting some of the lessons on the computer and letting the students explore on their own I will be reaching another segment of my learning population. Again I sometimes question if doing work on the computers is actually reaching any one, the hard part to remember is that all students learn in different ways, and it is my job to present the material in as many different ways as possible to reach as many kids as possible. Computers is just another avenue for reaching some kids.
Friday, November 14, 2008
Website
https://sites.google.com/site/broncoblack77/
My intention is to give the students some information regarding my classroom policies . This site could also be used by parents who need to know what is going on inside our building. The following pages could have information regarding homework policy, announcements about when homework is due, upcoming tests or projects, late work policy etc.
Once again I was pleasantly surprised at how easy it was to figure out how to navigate and produce a website. It is very likely I will use this in my classroom in the future.
My intention is to give the students some information regarding my classroom policies . This site could also be used by parents who need to know what is going on inside our building. The following pages could have information regarding homework policy, announcements about when homework is due, upcoming tests or projects, late work policy etc.
Once again I was pleasantly surprised at how easy it was to figure out how to navigate and produce a website. It is very likely I will use this in my classroom in the future.
Wednesday, November 12, 2008
Chapter 27
Looking at the 2004 ISPI/ASTD PT competencies I would like to focus on three of them. Hopefully I am some what competent in all these areas but as we all know there is always room for improvement in our professional life. I will focus my discussion on the three listed below:
Results for the student most often is the grade they are receiving. For most of my kids the most important thing about an assignment is filling in the correct answer on a piece of paper. For me the most important thing is that some information goes into the students brain. The only way I can tell if they have it or not is to continually refer back to something that has already been taught to see if they can continue to reply with the correct answer. This reinforces their learning and hopefully something sticks for a long period of time. In the end the goal is to have the kids focus on learning something not on the grade they receive, this is hard to achieve because grades are so important in society today.
Collaboration between students is definitely an area that I need work on. I know the experts say that students working with other students is a great way for everyone to learn something. I have not found this to be the case at all. If I choose the groups then the students generally don't divide up the work evenly. Some kids don't trust the others to do the work, and are not willing to risk the project not getting completed because a member of the group does not hold up their part of the project. So some of the group members end up doing all the work so that it comes out the way they want. If I allow the kids to pick their own groups then people work with their friends, some of the projects are well done, while others don't get done at all. So while the research shows that group work is a valuable learning experience I am still looking for the happy medium that I feel allows all the kids to be a valued member of a group. This is an on going process for me.
On another level working with my co workers in a group is not at all a problem. The staff has been together for a minimum of 5 years, some of course have been there longer, be the newest staff member has been there for 5 years. This makes group work so much easier, we all know each others strengths and weaknesses, so when we divide up the tasks we all know who is good at what and we plan accordingly. No one gets "stuck" with something they don't want to do, and the project runs smoothly. All because we have professional people each doing a portion of the work that is interesting to them.
As I have already talked about results in the above paragraph, I will focus this discussion on the evaluation portion of the statement.
Fortunately I teach a subject that can be evaluated objectively, this makes things so much easier. Tests can be true/ false, multiple choice, short answer, or essay, the first three of which are objective evaluations. Essay questions can be open to interpretation and thus are subjective. So on most of the tests I give the answer is either right or wrong. Student evaluation is easy.
Now when we move to the program level of running the school things are a little different. The staff sees a problem and suggests a solution, or the administrator sees a problem and tells the staff what the solution will be. Evaluating this kind of program is a bit harder to do. Every person on the staff has a different opinion of what is working and what is not. Generally, they all have a different suggestion on fixing the problem. If the principal mandates a solution the staff feels the process was forced upon them making buy in very difficult. Many times if a new program is unsuccessful it is just thrown out rather than being evaluated, tweaked, and tried again. The more veteran teachers are much harder to convince to try something new because in many cases "they have tried it before and it didn't work." Once again junking a good idea because it was not evaluated and revised to fit the needs of the school. So evaluating any school program is essential but not always put into practice.
- Focus on results and help clients [students] focus on results.
- Use partnerships or collaborate with clients [students ] and other experts as required.
- Be systematic in all aspects of the process including: The evaluation of the process and the results.
Results for the student most often is the grade they are receiving. For most of my kids the most important thing about an assignment is filling in the correct answer on a piece of paper. For me the most important thing is that some information goes into the students brain. The only way I can tell if they have it or not is to continually refer back to something that has already been taught to see if they can continue to reply with the correct answer. This reinforces their learning and hopefully something sticks for a long period of time. In the end the goal is to have the kids focus on learning something not on the grade they receive, this is hard to achieve because grades are so important in society today.
Collaboration between students is definitely an area that I need work on. I know the experts say that students working with other students is a great way for everyone to learn something. I have not found this to be the case at all. If I choose the groups then the students generally don't divide up the work evenly. Some kids don't trust the others to do the work, and are not willing to risk the project not getting completed because a member of the group does not hold up their part of the project. So some of the group members end up doing all the work so that it comes out the way they want. If I allow the kids to pick their own groups then people work with their friends, some of the projects are well done, while others don't get done at all. So while the research shows that group work is a valuable learning experience I am still looking for the happy medium that I feel allows all the kids to be a valued member of a group. This is an on going process for me.
On another level working with my co workers in a group is not at all a problem. The staff has been together for a minimum of 5 years, some of course have been there longer, be the newest staff member has been there for 5 years. This makes group work so much easier, we all know each others strengths and weaknesses, so when we divide up the tasks we all know who is good at what and we plan accordingly. No one gets "stuck" with something they don't want to do, and the project runs smoothly. All because we have professional people each doing a portion of the work that is interesting to them.
As I have already talked about results in the above paragraph, I will focus this discussion on the evaluation portion of the statement.
Fortunately I teach a subject that can be evaluated objectively, this makes things so much easier. Tests can be true/ false, multiple choice, short answer, or essay, the first three of which are objective evaluations. Essay questions can be open to interpretation and thus are subjective. So on most of the tests I give the answer is either right or wrong. Student evaluation is easy.
Now when we move to the program level of running the school things are a little different. The staff sees a problem and suggests a solution, or the administrator sees a problem and tells the staff what the solution will be. Evaluating this kind of program is a bit harder to do. Every person on the staff has a different opinion of what is working and what is not. Generally, they all have a different suggestion on fixing the problem. If the principal mandates a solution the staff feels the process was forced upon them making buy in very difficult. Many times if a new program is unsuccessful it is just thrown out rather than being evaluated, tweaked, and tried again. The more veteran teachers are much harder to convince to try something new because in many cases "they have tried it before and it didn't work." Once again junking a good idea because it was not evaluated and revised to fit the needs of the school. So evaluating any school program is essential but not always put into practice.
Friday, November 7, 2008
Week 11
I produced a video that my students could use to get a start on Power Point. If I made it longer I would be able to show them many of the features, but this gives you the general idea of how the tutorial would work.
Wednesday, November 5, 2008
Chap. 22
The first thing that came through loud and clear in all the subjects writings is that working in a university setting is very demanding and time consuming. It seemed as if the work being done outside of teaching was as important as instructing class, but I realize that is only because the purpose of this writing was to show the organizational structure of the instructional design process. I'm sure everyone of us reading the article could say the same thing about our current teaching positions. We are all required to be involved in the school organization in various capacities outside of teaching in the class room. As much as we would like to close our class room door and just teach it is not possible in today's world. So our profession from Kindergarten to college demands large amounts of time to things related to the school but not about teaching students in the school.
The state of Michigan demands that its teachers are highly qualified to teach their specific subjects. Gone are the days when a teaching certificate reads K-12 in any area, some may remember when anyone was allowed to teach 7th and 8th. So in the K-12 education arena a teacher must continually take classes to keep their teaching certificate current. Brenda Litchfield, seemed to take on the role of faculty development person at her university. Her job involved orientation of new faculty members, providing workshops for continuous teacher development, and helping individual teachers reach their full teaching potential. It seems that Brenda keeps abreast of the current trends in education, along with the latest technology updates and tries to distribute the information to her colleagues. She took on this role voluntarily, in our school system a very similar thing happens, especially in regards to technology. Some of the teachers are willing and able to learn new techniques and ways to use technology in the classroom. This includes how to plug in, set up, and trouble shoot some basic items on any of the machines being used. Other teachers have no use for learning something new, and are content let someone else learn it first and then just teach them what they need to know. Knowing that this is the "way of the world" in our buildings the so called experts are more than willing to help out the others with how things work. We are all aware of the people who will share their knowlege, these people are the ones who are encouraged to go to conferences and training sessions so that everyone can benefit from the expertice of one person. It sounds very similar to what Brenda Litchfield did for her fellow teachers at the university she worked at.
What I learned after reading this chapter is that across the board, teachers, instructors, professors, or what ever other title a person has, are one of the hardest working group of professionals around.
In the earlier grades papers need to be checked and the next days instructional materials need to be organized. This is not done when 25 little people are sitting in front of you, each one with some very important piece of information that you absolutely need to hear. In addition the classroom teacher has four or five different subjects that need to be taught regularly, with standards and benchmarks that need to be met. In the later grades generally the teacher has one subject to teach but might have an honors class along with a remedial one. So while the subject matter is the same the preparation is different. As we read in the text university instructors are expected to do research and publish papers, or write grants along with their teaching duties. So when the teaching day ends the working day begins. We all know friends and neighbors who come home from work and are done for the day, rarely is this the case with a teacher.
The first thing that came through loud and clear in all the subjects writings is that working in a university setting is very demanding and time consuming. It seemed as if the work being done outside of teaching was as important as instructing class, but I realize that is only because the purpose of this writing was to show the organizational structure of the instructional design process. I'm sure everyone of us reading the article could say the same thing about our current teaching positions. We are all required to be involved in the school organization in various capacities outside of teaching in the class room. As much as we would like to close our class room door and just teach it is not possible in today's world. So our profession from Kindergarten to college demands large amounts of time to things related to the school but not about teaching students in the school.
The state of Michigan demands that its teachers are highly qualified to teach their specific subjects. Gone are the days when a teaching certificate reads K-12 in any area, some may remember when anyone was allowed to teach 7th and 8th. So in the K-12 education arena a teacher must continually take classes to keep their teaching certificate current. Brenda Litchfield, seemed to take on the role of faculty development person at her university. Her job involved orientation of new faculty members, providing workshops for continuous teacher development, and helping individual teachers reach their full teaching potential. It seems that Brenda keeps abreast of the current trends in education, along with the latest technology updates and tries to distribute the information to her colleagues. She took on this role voluntarily, in our school system a very similar thing happens, especially in regards to technology. Some of the teachers are willing and able to learn new techniques and ways to use technology in the classroom. This includes how to plug in, set up, and trouble shoot some basic items on any of the machines being used. Other teachers have no use for learning something new, and are content let someone else learn it first and then just teach them what they need to know. Knowing that this is the "way of the world" in our buildings the so called experts are more than willing to help out the others with how things work. We are all aware of the people who will share their knowlege, these people are the ones who are encouraged to go to conferences and training sessions so that everyone can benefit from the expertice of one person. It sounds very similar to what Brenda Litchfield did for her fellow teachers at the university she worked at.
What I learned after reading this chapter is that across the board, teachers, instructors, professors, or what ever other title a person has, are one of the hardest working group of professionals around.
In the earlier grades papers need to be checked and the next days instructional materials need to be organized. This is not done when 25 little people are sitting in front of you, each one with some very important piece of information that you absolutely need to hear. In addition the classroom teacher has four or five different subjects that need to be taught regularly, with standards and benchmarks that need to be met. In the later grades generally the teacher has one subject to teach but might have an honors class along with a remedial one. So while the subject matter is the same the preparation is different. As we read in the text university instructors are expected to do research and publish papers, or write grants along with their teaching duties. So when the teaching day ends the working day begins. We all know friends and neighbors who come home from work and are done for the day, rarely is this the case with a teacher.
Wednesday, October 29, 2008
Chap. 21
As we have all heard many times, change is hard, basically that is what this chapter is talking about. Teachers that I have known are particularly hard to change, they like things the way they are and always have been. Think about the teacher who has been in the same grade perhaps even the same room for 20 years or more!! If this person is one of the exceptional teachers in the building then you can assume that they have figured out what works best for them and their students and that is way things are taught, forget about all the new techniques and strategies. Now assume that someone in authority has decided to bring about systemic change to the school district. I'm sure you can see the resistance coming from the veteran teacher.
It was interesting reading about the amount of preparation and planning needed to institute a major change in a school system. I am in a very small district and could not imagine that that much planning would go into a change that was planned for my district. It sounded like a lot of talk and not a lot of substance, but then I started to relate it to the change that we did implement this school year. Our high school decided to go to trimesters this year. The reasons for this change were many but the most important one was that trimesters would allow our failing students the opportunity to pass and continue their education in compliance with the new state requirements. So last school year when it was time to start scheduling the students into classes a decision had to be made as to weather the classes would be semesters or trimesters. The decision from the top was trimesters. Kids were scheduled, teachers were given their assignments and the school year started in Sept. This was a much different approach than what is described in our text. Missing from our approach was the setting up of the framework, the discussions with stakeholders ( parents, teachers, staff ) as to how this would work and was it the best education for our kids. Also the teachers were given no time to learn and prepare for a new school day. The result is that we are now seeing cracks in the system and fixing the cracks will be band aid variety at best. Teachers are grappling the re aligning their curriculum to the new time frame, trying to figure out how all that teaching will fit into the new set of minutes per class. What needs to be cut out, what can be looked at more in depth. Looking back, which is always with 20/20 vision we probably should have talked about this change for another whole school year, and implemented it starting in Sept. 2009. My guess is the transition would have been much smoother.
It was interesting reading about the amount of preparation and planning needed to institute a major change in a school system. I am in a very small district and could not imagine that that much planning would go into a change that was planned for my district. It sounded like a lot of talk and not a lot of substance, but then I started to relate it to the change that we did implement this school year. Our high school decided to go to trimesters this year. The reasons for this change were many but the most important one was that trimesters would allow our failing students the opportunity to pass and continue their education in compliance with the new state requirements. So last school year when it was time to start scheduling the students into classes a decision had to be made as to weather the classes would be semesters or trimesters. The decision from the top was trimesters. Kids were scheduled, teachers were given their assignments and the school year started in Sept. This was a much different approach than what is described in our text. Missing from our approach was the setting up of the framework, the discussions with stakeholders ( parents, teachers, staff ) as to how this would work and was it the best education for our kids. Also the teachers were given no time to learn and prepare for a new school day. The result is that we are now seeing cracks in the system and fixing the cracks will be band aid variety at best. Teachers are grappling the re aligning their curriculum to the new time frame, trying to figure out how all that teaching will fit into the new set of minutes per class. What needs to be cut out, what can be looked at more in depth. Looking back, which is always with 20/20 vision we probably should have talked about this change for another whole school year, and implemented it starting in Sept. 2009. My guess is the transition would have been much smoother.
Sunday, October 26, 2008
What to do with a map?
We just finished studying the American Revolution. We talked about the troops and where they travelled, also how people got from place to place, as there were no cars, trains, planes, etc. As you can see I put a map of the Northern colonies on my blog. The students can now use the distance finding tools to measure how far the troops actually walked or rode horses to get to Quebec. Also Ethan Allen and the Green Mountain boys attacked Fort Ticonderoga and dragged the cannons they acquired over to Boston and the Battle of Bunker Hill. Using Google maps and measuring the distance these troops travelled will be a real eye opener for the kids. I can also use this when we are studying the Oregon Trail.
Monday, October 20, 2008
Class so far
It's a good thing this question was not asked five weeks ago!! The anxiety level was way up there back then. But after getting into the routine it's like anything else you get used to the expectations and learn to roll with the punches. While it was not a comfortable feeling I can see the validity of just jumping in with both feet and doing it. Now that I look back I can understand the reasoning. If you think about it the same amount of anxiety takes place in any new class you take, the only differance is in a classroom you can turn to the person sitting next to you and say " Are you getting any of this?" Misery loves company after all!! After reading some of the other blogs, I realized we were all in the same boat, we just couldn't see the frustration on each others faces. So with the benefit of hind sight I can see the method behind the madness, and I can't really think of a better way to start. I assume you are aware of the ansgt it generates with the students, I also assume that has leveled out as time goes on.
Chap. 18
As I was thinking about industry using technology to make life better or more productive, I thought about our fellow student Steve who teaches flying. Flying students are able to use simulators to hone their skills and practice manuevers without actually going up in the air. A very good use of technology in my opinion. This led me to another idea, how about putting teen age student drivers into simulators. First of all it shouldn't be that hard as we have tons of race car driving games already available. Then with some adaptations to the game kids could be exposed to all kinds of driving conditions. Consider the powerful impact the simulator could have by emulating a drunk driver, how the kids would view the road, varinging the perceptions, blurring the obstacles, making objects seem double, fuzzy signal lights. The more I think about it I'm actually wondering why this has not been invented yet. Then the program could make various weather conditions, the sky's the limit, [grin ]. So the road could be icy, snowy, wet, slick with leafs, in our area we have fish flies also known as June bugs that make the roads slippery. If you lived near a desert sand storms, or water over the roads if you are close to rivers, lakes etc. Rules of the road is another area that could be explored. Fire engines, ambulances, and police vehicles could all enter the picture. Accidents could occur in front of the driver, practice passing large trucks, stopping at railroad crossings, the list goes on and on. I believe you get the idea, while I am not currently a driver ed. instructor I was once a long time ago. I actually got into an accident with a student driving, a simulated accident would have been much cheaper, and a lot easier on my heart.
Businesses use technology to keep their employees current on developments in their field. This is especially useful if the business is an international one. The employee can sit at his/her desk learn about the culture and laws of the foreign country and apply them to the business they are running. One example is the car companies, even doing business in a country as close as Canada requires a knowledge of their laws, taxes, money exchange rates and how that will affect the hourly rates of employees wages. Of course, large companies must show a profit so all of these factors must be taken into account before any product is sold. Imagine a new employee trying to run a transaction with a foreign worker even though they work for the same company. If the new employee had no knowledge of how the foreign employee did business it would be a mess. Hence, the use of the computer to have a set of instructions, rules and regulations, and tests to help all workers in all countries stay on the same page. The employees are not thrilled with having to take the courses, so the business ties their promotions to the number of courses the employee has completed. Their has to be a hook somewhere, and the pay check is always the easiest to use.
Businesses use technology to keep their employees current on developments in their field. This is especially useful if the business is an international one. The employee can sit at his/her desk learn about the culture and laws of the foreign country and apply them to the business they are running. One example is the car companies, even doing business in a country as close as Canada requires a knowledge of their laws, taxes, money exchange rates and how that will affect the hourly rates of employees wages. Of course, large companies must show a profit so all of these factors must be taken into account before any product is sold. Imagine a new employee trying to run a transaction with a foreign worker even though they work for the same company. If the new employee had no knowledge of how the foreign employee did business it would be a mess. Hence, the use of the computer to have a set of instructions, rules and regulations, and tests to help all workers in all countries stay on the same page. The employees are not thrilled with having to take the courses, so the business ties their promotions to the number of courses the employee has completed. Their has to be a hook somewhere, and the pay check is always the easiest to use.
Tuesday, October 14, 2008
Chap. 14
I found that the diagram on pg. 141 pretty much sums up the whole chapter for me, and applies to what we as teachers do every day. So let's take a look at what we do.
Paper work is the backbone of the teaching industry, all the way from lesson plans to student worksheets. We are organized and we do know where it is we want to go, our administrators want to have curriculum maps for the entire school year, there is no question we are organized. We have goals provided for us by the State of Michigan, the federal government, and our local school districts. Teachers definitely have the organization part down pat.
We also know what the performance is we want the kids to achieve. Sometimes I tell my 8th graders let's just give you all A's on your report card and then we can worry about you learning something!! They like the idea of getting the A's, it's the let's learn something that's the hard part. Performance takes many shapes and forms. Currrently we are taking the MEAP test, talk about knowing the desired performance, we've been preparing for the MEAP for weeks now. Everyone knows the performance that is expected on this test. Once again, just because the kids know the expectations does not mean they are going to perform to that level. This leads to the idea that some students will purposely do poorly on the MEAP, just because they know the expectations are so high from all the adults around them, others can't meet the expectations no matter how hard they try. Remember the part in the chapter where the military screened the personnel so they could get the recruits that would have a better chance of completing the task and only teaching those men the activity. The ones that didn't make the grade were assigned to other activities. That is not allowed in todays educational world, high schools are now only training kids to go to college. We all know that not all kids belong in college, we still need electrictions, plumbers, bus drivers, and construction workers. Our educational system has no room for training these students, this is one difference from the chapter and the diagram. According to the chapter training workers to do the best job possible and finding the occupation that will help the company grow and survive is a valued goal. That is not always true in education.
Paper work is the backbone of the teaching industry, all the way from lesson plans to student worksheets. We are organized and we do know where it is we want to go, our administrators want to have curriculum maps for the entire school year, there is no question we are organized. We have goals provided for us by the State of Michigan, the federal government, and our local school districts. Teachers definitely have the organization part down pat.
We also know what the performance is we want the kids to achieve. Sometimes I tell my 8th graders let's just give you all A's on your report card and then we can worry about you learning something!! They like the idea of getting the A's, it's the let's learn something that's the hard part. Performance takes many shapes and forms. Currrently we are taking the MEAP test, talk about knowing the desired performance, we've been preparing for the MEAP for weeks now. Everyone knows the performance that is expected on this test. Once again, just because the kids know the expectations does not mean they are going to perform to that level. This leads to the idea that some students will purposely do poorly on the MEAP, just because they know the expectations are so high from all the adults around them, others can't meet the expectations no matter how hard they try. Remember the part in the chapter where the military screened the personnel so they could get the recruits that would have a better chance of completing the task and only teaching those men the activity. The ones that didn't make the grade were assigned to other activities. That is not allowed in todays educational world, high schools are now only training kids to go to college. We all know that not all kids belong in college, we still need electrictions, plumbers, bus drivers, and construction workers. Our educational system has no room for training these students, this is one difference from the chapter and the diagram. According to the chapter training workers to do the best job possible and finding the occupation that will help the company grow and survive is a valued goal. That is not always true in education.
Sunday, October 12, 2008
Wednesday, October 8, 2008
Chap. 3
Will the internet have a major impact on grade school students?
I think the internet will be a part of elementary school curriculum for a long time to come. The work world runs on computers, everything from working at McDonalds to being president of a major company, to owning your own business. All of these undertakings have computers attached to them, payroll, writing memos, e-mail, sending documents as attachments, ringing up a sale, setting up meetings the list goes on and on. People have to learn how to accomplish these tasks.. that falls on the schools. The little kids have leap frog, play stations, and Sesame Street. As they get older the "toys" get more expensive but the learning to manipulate them still lies with the schools. So keyboarding, typing memos, excel spreadsheets, database applications, cad programs will all need to be taught. It is very unlikely that a K -12 learner is going to sit down, by him/her self, at a computer and learn excel. It may not be a human being standing in front of a class that does the teaching though, it may be a computer tutorial program. Either way the learning will go on in an educational setting. Even though learning about computer games will take place outside of school, the education of business type programs will be taught in school. The progression will start with the little kids learning to navigate programs and servers, saving, opening, adding file names etc. and will progress to the upper grades where they will learn the current programs for business use. I suspect the need for classes like the one we are currently taking will also remain a necessity... the teachers after all have to stay one step ahead of the students. The more they learn in the early grades the farther advanced they will be in the higher grades. Teachers will not be able to rest on their laurels.. they will have to keep their skills current also. Hence the need for ongoing professional development.
While there are some excellent computer programs available for student learning I don't foresee the end of having human teachers standing in front of kids. The personal connection that teachers have with students is irreplaceable. So the computer becomes another learning tool instead of a replacement teacher.
As students get older the internet can become a source of income, or give people the ability to work at home. Teleconferencing, email, placing orders over the web all allow some individuals the ability to work from home. This is a huge change from the old days when everyone had to leave the house and go to work. As we are experiencing high gas prices imagine how nice it would be to leave the car in the garage and work from the living room couch.
Training and testing is also convenient on the internet. One example is the Federal Aviation Administration testing. The FAA can administer its flying tests to anyone in the country over the internet. This is a huge time and money saver. Students who need to take an exam simply sit in front of a computer take the test, it is scored immediately and the results sent to the FAA all without a human test overseer. The student knows immediately if he/she passed, and the FAA has the information needed to issue the appropriate license. This is one area where our tax dollars seem to be operating efficiently.
It will be interesting to see where the technology leads us in the future.
I think the internet will be a part of elementary school curriculum for a long time to come. The work world runs on computers, everything from working at McDonalds to being president of a major company, to owning your own business. All of these undertakings have computers attached to them, payroll, writing memos, e-mail, sending documents as attachments, ringing up a sale, setting up meetings the list goes on and on. People have to learn how to accomplish these tasks.. that falls on the schools. The little kids have leap frog, play stations, and Sesame Street. As they get older the "toys" get more expensive but the learning to manipulate them still lies with the schools. So keyboarding, typing memos, excel spreadsheets, database applications, cad programs will all need to be taught. It is very unlikely that a K -12 learner is going to sit down, by him/her self, at a computer and learn excel. It may not be a human being standing in front of a class that does the teaching though, it may be a computer tutorial program. Either way the learning will go on in an educational setting. Even though learning about computer games will take place outside of school, the education of business type programs will be taught in school. The progression will start with the little kids learning to navigate programs and servers, saving, opening, adding file names etc. and will progress to the upper grades where they will learn the current programs for business use. I suspect the need for classes like the one we are currently taking will also remain a necessity... the teachers after all have to stay one step ahead of the students. The more they learn in the early grades the farther advanced they will be in the higher grades. Teachers will not be able to rest on their laurels.. they will have to keep their skills current also. Hence the need for ongoing professional development.
While there are some excellent computer programs available for student learning I don't foresee the end of having human teachers standing in front of kids. The personal connection that teachers have with students is irreplaceable. So the computer becomes another learning tool instead of a replacement teacher.
As students get older the internet can become a source of income, or give people the ability to work at home. Teleconferencing, email, placing orders over the web all allow some individuals the ability to work from home. This is a huge change from the old days when everyone had to leave the house and go to work. As we are experiencing high gas prices imagine how nice it would be to leave the car in the garage and work from the living room couch.
Training and testing is also convenient on the internet. One example is the Federal Aviation Administration testing. The FAA can administer its flying tests to anyone in the country over the internet. This is a huge time and money saver. Students who need to take an exam simply sit in front of a computer take the test, it is scored immediately and the results sent to the FAA all without a human test overseer. The student knows immediately if he/she passed, and the FAA has the information needed to issue the appropriate license. This is one area where our tax dollars seem to be operating efficiently.
It will be interesting to see where the technology leads us in the future.
Sunday, October 5, 2008
Wednesday, October 1, 2008
Chapter 2
What is Instructional Design?
We have this wonderful model for instructional design, I am going to try to fit it into today's educational scheme.
Analysis, hmmmmm some educator who long ago taught school, probably for a short time and has since become a government employee, decides that the State of Michigan should see how all of the children in Michigan are progressing. How well are the children in Michigan learning, are they all learning at the same rate, and the same things. The answer must have been no, because the solution was to give the kids a test, hence MEAP. Once the process was started it grew and grew, like all good government departments. So instead of having just one test we are now testing many subjects, at many grade levels.
Design, part of design is to write objectives in measurable terms, we have GLCS and HSCS now for all grade levels. They are not written in measurable terms, that is for the teachers to figure out. Just make sure you are teaching what the state wants. But wait there's more, some data gurus have come up with the MEAP blueprint. This piece of data examines the test questions and tells teachers what percentage of the test questions are asked in which catagories of the test. For example, more narrative questions are asked than informational on the ELA portion of the MEAP, this helps the teachers in instruction and what to focus on the most.
Development, the MEAP has been an ongoing testing project, it is constantly being refined. When the economy is going strong the developers of the test put in some paragraph writing questions. These require extensive resources to score as many man hours are needed for reading all that writing. When the economy is not doing so well, like now, then the questions are multiple choice these are much more objective and a machine can score them which is very economical. The MEAP makers are always trying out different ways of conducting the test. One year the questions are all the same, this comes under attack because some students don't have the same background knowledge as others. So the developers put in a variety of questions, this comes under attack because some of the questions are harder than others. So we know that the test is constantly being refined.
Implementation, we have a testing window so all students are taking the test at the same time. Students that are slower readers or writers are given more time and extra help. This has also been refined so that the students are now all taking the same portion of the test on the same day.
Evaluation, there are two kinds of evaluation, formative and summative.
Formative first, teachers are constantly going over MEAP data to revise their instruction. When the results come out meetings are held to go over the progress that was made on the MEAP. In other words "how did our kids do", if the answer is they didn't do so good then instruction will be revised so they perform better the next time. This helps keep all school districts on the same tract teaching the same curriculum across the state. If the answer is we did great then the teachers will be told to keep doing what is working, you must be doing something right because the kids are doing well on the test.
Summative, results of the various school districts are published in the newspapers, for all the world to see. Parents can see which school districts are doing well on the test and get their students into those districts. The reverse of this is the districts that aren't doing so well are labeled as failures in a public forum. School districts doing well publicize their results in hopes of attracting more students, more students means more funding for that district.
It appears that the MEAP test fits into the instructional design model presented in chapter 2 of our book.
We have this wonderful model for instructional design, I am going to try to fit it into today's educational scheme.
Analysis, hmmmmm some educator who long ago taught school, probably for a short time and has since become a government employee, decides that the State of Michigan should see how all of the children in Michigan are progressing. How well are the children in Michigan learning, are they all learning at the same rate, and the same things. The answer must have been no, because the solution was to give the kids a test, hence MEAP. Once the process was started it grew and grew, like all good government departments. So instead of having just one test we are now testing many subjects, at many grade levels.
Design, part of design is to write objectives in measurable terms, we have GLCS and HSCS now for all grade levels. They are not written in measurable terms, that is for the teachers to figure out. Just make sure you are teaching what the state wants. But wait there's more, some data gurus have come up with the MEAP blueprint. This piece of data examines the test questions and tells teachers what percentage of the test questions are asked in which catagories of the test. For example, more narrative questions are asked than informational on the ELA portion of the MEAP, this helps the teachers in instruction and what to focus on the most.
Development, the MEAP has been an ongoing testing project, it is constantly being refined. When the economy is going strong the developers of the test put in some paragraph writing questions. These require extensive resources to score as many man hours are needed for reading all that writing. When the economy is not doing so well, like now, then the questions are multiple choice these are much more objective and a machine can score them which is very economical. The MEAP makers are always trying out different ways of conducting the test. One year the questions are all the same, this comes under attack because some students don't have the same background knowledge as others. So the developers put in a variety of questions, this comes under attack because some of the questions are harder than others. So we know that the test is constantly being refined.
Implementation, we have a testing window so all students are taking the test at the same time. Students that are slower readers or writers are given more time and extra help. This has also been refined so that the students are now all taking the same portion of the test on the same day.
Evaluation, there are two kinds of evaluation, formative and summative.
Formative first, teachers are constantly going over MEAP data to revise their instruction. When the results come out meetings are held to go over the progress that was made on the MEAP. In other words "how did our kids do", if the answer is they didn't do so good then instruction will be revised so they perform better the next time. This helps keep all school districts on the same tract teaching the same curriculum across the state. If the answer is we did great then the teachers will be told to keep doing what is working, you must be doing something right because the kids are doing well on the test.
Summative, results of the various school districts are published in the newspapers, for all the world to see. Parents can see which school districts are doing well on the test and get their students into those districts. The reverse of this is the districts that aren't doing so well are labeled as failures in a public forum. School districts doing well publicize their results in hopes of attracting more students, more students means more funding for that district.
It appears that the MEAP test fits into the instructional design model presented in chapter 2 of our book.
Tuesday, September 30, 2008
Tuesday, September 23, 2008
Uses for Social Bookmarking
My head has been spinning with all this new stuff I now have at my disposal, what with trying to figure out how to make it all work and then what to do with it. But I think the light bulb just turned on, hopefully it will shine bright and not dim. I'll write it down and you all can comment to tell me where my thinking is flawed.
The RSS is for our personal use, keeping track of web sites we like to visit.
The delicious web site is for places we like to visit AND we can share them with others.
The blog is where we brag about all the cool stuff we know. Aha I believe that's it in a nutshell for me. Now that I have the big picture what can I do with these resources?
I'm thinking that the social bookmark part can be used as a homework hot line kind of thing. Parents and kids can find all kinds of help in one place. The teacher could have a personal web page that lists the homework for the night, or week or whatever. The pages that need to be read, perhaps problems {math} or questions that needed to be answered. Also, some web sites for homework help, places the kids could go to ask questions from a real live person, or places like Wikipedia where they could find informational answers. The Social Studies and Science teachers could have links to places like the History channel or National Geographic to see videos of whatever topics are being discussed in class.
This could also be a place where students grades could be posted, anonymously of course. I am assuming all students have some sort of student ID number, using this number the grades could be placed on the internet. Parents and students know their own number and can see their current grade, perhaps using a Word table document or an Excel spreadsheet. Small comments could be added, i.e. wastes time in class, has many missing assignments, poor test scores, etc.
Chapter One, What Field Did You Say You Were In?
I know this is dating myself but here goes. I can remember when it was a big deal to watch a movie in school. There really weren't that many films for education thus we didn't see a lot of them, thus it was a big deal when we did. I must also say that we had the most recent technology when the film projector was self threading. The teachers made a big deal out of that, wouldn't they be surprised to see a video streaming through a computer. We even had an audio visual aide-- some kid who was allowed to deliver the film projectors to the class rooms.
I believe we are still struggling with part 2 of the 1970 definition today. How are we as teachers going to bring the use of technology into the classroom to be used as an aide in the learning process? Presently most of the educators I know are still teaching how to use computers, showing the students what a computer can do and how to make it work, that is much different than using technology as a learning tool.
It appears to me that as the use of technology increased in schools the need to re-define the name of what we are doing became essential. A few years ago we had media specialists who had taken over for librarians, now even that name has disappeared because the media has become so broad no one can be a specialist in the whole media realm. Just as the person working in the library has broadened their horizons, so also has the field of Instructional Technology. It can't help but to keep re defining itself as the use of technology continues to expand. Every year the possibilities of learning and growing with technology increases it's almost impossible to keep up with it all, it's growing so rapidly. So then the definition must also grow and change with the times.
I noticed that very little if anything was said about students and education, the focus seems to be more on the workplace. I don't really have a problem with that, I believe the schools are trying to help make people in the workplace better employees by giving them some instruction with the technology available. Apparently the state government agrees because they have written into the law that computer benchmarks must be met before a student can graduate.
The RSS is for our personal use, keeping track of web sites we like to visit.
The delicious web site is for places we like to visit AND we can share them with others.
The blog is where we brag about all the cool stuff we know. Aha I believe that's it in a nutshell for me. Now that I have the big picture what can I do with these resources?
I'm thinking that the social bookmark part can be used as a homework hot line kind of thing. Parents and kids can find all kinds of help in one place. The teacher could have a personal web page that lists the homework for the night, or week or whatever. The pages that need to be read, perhaps problems {math} or questions that needed to be answered. Also, some web sites for homework help, places the kids could go to ask questions from a real live person, or places like Wikipedia where they could find informational answers. The Social Studies and Science teachers could have links to places like the History channel or National Geographic to see videos of whatever topics are being discussed in class.
This could also be a place where students grades could be posted, anonymously of course. I am assuming all students have some sort of student ID number, using this number the grades could be placed on the internet. Parents and students know their own number and can see their current grade, perhaps using a Word table document or an Excel spreadsheet. Small comments could be added, i.e. wastes time in class, has many missing assignments, poor test scores, etc.
Chapter One, What Field Did You Say You Were In?
I know this is dating myself but here goes. I can remember when it was a big deal to watch a movie in school. There really weren't that many films for education thus we didn't see a lot of them, thus it was a big deal when we did. I must also say that we had the most recent technology when the film projector was self threading. The teachers made a big deal out of that, wouldn't they be surprised to see a video streaming through a computer. We even had an audio visual aide-- some kid who was allowed to deliver the film projectors to the class rooms.
I believe we are still struggling with part 2 of the 1970 definition today. How are we as teachers going to bring the use of technology into the classroom to be used as an aide in the learning process? Presently most of the educators I know are still teaching how to use computers, showing the students what a computer can do and how to make it work, that is much different than using technology as a learning tool.
It appears to me that as the use of technology increased in schools the need to re-define the name of what we are doing became essential. A few years ago we had media specialists who had taken over for librarians, now even that name has disappeared because the media has become so broad no one can be a specialist in the whole media realm. Just as the person working in the library has broadened their horizons, so also has the field of Instructional Technology. It can't help but to keep re defining itself as the use of technology continues to expand. Every year the possibilities of learning and growing with technology increases it's almost impossible to keep up with it all, it's growing so rapidly. So then the definition must also grow and change with the times.
I noticed that very little if anything was said about students and education, the focus seems to be more on the workplace. I don't really have a problem with that, I believe the schools are trying to help make people in the workplace better employees by giving them some instruction with the technology available. Apparently the state government agrees because they have written into the law that computer benchmarks must be met before a student can graduate.
Sunday, September 21, 2008
Thursday, September 18, 2008
Wiki page
I found it interesting that group work over the internet is similar to an actual classroom setting. Everyone has to agree on a format, and the work needs to be split up. Then it is up to the integrity of each individual to complete their portion of the assignment. I'm guessing that each group had one person in it that was very concerned about the grade that would be assigned to the group project, in my experience this person would make sure that the project met all the objectives and looked good, because their individual grade was influenced by the work of the others in the group. While I understand that the educational world places a high value on group work, stating that lots of learning goes on between members of the group, as a teacher I have shied away from group work. When I did group projects a few years ago I observed a few things that made me give them up. First and foremost is the idea that I stated above, the student that was most concerned about their grade put in the most work on the project. If I put the kids into groups the way the "educational experts" suggest this would mean one or two students did all the work, while the others in the group socialized. If I allowed the students to choose their own groups then, naturally, they worked with friends, so I ended up with some really terrific projects and some junk. In the end I never really saw the outcome that the experts always predict will happen, that the lower kids will learn from the higher kids. Consequently I don't do group projects anymore!!!
Saturday, September 6, 2008
Reflecting on Education
Reflections on Beyond Technology Integration:
As I read through this article a couple of statements jumped out at me that I will comment on. First, the author states that the educational system needs to switch it focus from "advancement of the fittest" to "advancement of all". This I believe is the same theory as No Child Left Behind, which, in my opinion, will soon fail because ALL children will never be able to graduate from high school. Some do not have the will power to stick it out, some have no desire to stick it out, and some will never be able to do Algebra II in order to graduate, myself included in the Algebra II category.
However, if you look back in history to the beginning of public education in America it was the desire of the powers that be that children of all social classes be able to attend school. This would allow all citizens the ability to read and understand what was going on in the government, thereby allowing every one to form their own opinion about who should run the country and how it should be done. Once again, the idea of "advancement of all" not just the ruling class.
Second, the idea was presented that children all learn at different rates. This I agree with. Also, a child should be able to master a topic and then move on to the next topic at their own speed. Thsi idea is great in theory, but lets look at the practically of it. Two students progressing at their own pace, both students end up in the same class, one student is 16 years old making steady progress, the other is 12 also making steady progress. The problem becomes a social one. The 16 year old could be far more sophisicated is the social setting than the 12 year old. Would the 16 year old be willing to work in a group with a 12 year old? and vice versa. What if the 12 year old is the only one in the class with all 16 year olds, who will that child be able to relate to? Are the parents of the 12 year old going to voice any concerns about their child being in a group with all older students?
Today, high school ends for students when they are about 18 years old. How long should the public education system allow a student to remain enrolled in order to complete their high school education. In the article you could argue that a student should be able to remain as long as they desire as long as they are making progress. If they are not making any progress will the student remain in school forever??
Reflections on Luddites:
I would like to start at the end of this article which poses the question, "What exactly is the business of schools?" and reflect on that for a bit.
I believe the author is correct in the statement that technology will not fix all that is wrong with education and society today. Technology, mainly computers, in schools is just another tool for the teacher to use to educate students. It's no different than the evolution of the black board. Long ago students had their own writing tablets to do their work. Large chalk boards placed in the front of the room allowed the teacher to put information in front of students so everyone could see it at once. The chalk was dusty and created cool puffy white clouds when the erasers were clapped together. The white board solved the problem of the chalk dust, it also let the teacher use color markers, but the ink smelled awful. Then came the smart white board allowing the teachers even more creativity in presenting material if they have the time to figure out how to use them effectively. I could draw the same parallels with technology, the typewriter being just one example. The keyboard hasn't changed in recent history, you use the same fingers to hit the same keys, the words appear as the keys are hit. The difference is how much easier it is to fix a mistake, how much more creative you can be with a virtual piece of paper instead of an actual piece of paper.
So back to the question, What is the business of schools today? In my opinion it is: give students a solid base of learning so that they can live in our society. It includes the basics, reading, writing, arithmatic, and computers because everything runs on computers these days. And, OH, by the way, add some character and self-esteem building, drug, alcohol, health, sex, economics, money management, positive behavior, problem solving, and group work. Make sure the students are being fed, and well cared for at home. If something else goes wrong in society you can be sure it will be put on the schools to fix it. Cram all that stuff into 6 hours a day for 180 days. And just to make things interesting we'll give the students five years of living and growing before we start educating them.
As I read through this article a couple of statements jumped out at me that I will comment on. First, the author states that the educational system needs to switch it focus from "advancement of the fittest" to "advancement of all". This I believe is the same theory as No Child Left Behind, which, in my opinion, will soon fail because ALL children will never be able to graduate from high school. Some do not have the will power to stick it out, some have no desire to stick it out, and some will never be able to do Algebra II in order to graduate, myself included in the Algebra II category.
However, if you look back in history to the beginning of public education in America it was the desire of the powers that be that children of all social classes be able to attend school. This would allow all citizens the ability to read and understand what was going on in the government, thereby allowing every one to form their own opinion about who should run the country and how it should be done. Once again, the idea of "advancement of all" not just the ruling class.
Second, the idea was presented that children all learn at different rates. This I agree with. Also, a child should be able to master a topic and then move on to the next topic at their own speed. Thsi idea is great in theory, but lets look at the practically of it. Two students progressing at their own pace, both students end up in the same class, one student is 16 years old making steady progress, the other is 12 also making steady progress. The problem becomes a social one. The 16 year old could be far more sophisicated is the social setting than the 12 year old. Would the 16 year old be willing to work in a group with a 12 year old? and vice versa. What if the 12 year old is the only one in the class with all 16 year olds, who will that child be able to relate to? Are the parents of the 12 year old going to voice any concerns about their child being in a group with all older students?
Today, high school ends for students when they are about 18 years old. How long should the public education system allow a student to remain enrolled in order to complete their high school education. In the article you could argue that a student should be able to remain as long as they desire as long as they are making progress. If they are not making any progress will the student remain in school forever??
Reflections on Luddites:
I would like to start at the end of this article which poses the question, "What exactly is the business of schools?" and reflect on that for a bit.
I believe the author is correct in the statement that technology will not fix all that is wrong with education and society today. Technology, mainly computers, in schools is just another tool for the teacher to use to educate students. It's no different than the evolution of the black board. Long ago students had their own writing tablets to do their work. Large chalk boards placed in the front of the room allowed the teacher to put information in front of students so everyone could see it at once. The chalk was dusty and created cool puffy white clouds when the erasers were clapped together. The white board solved the problem of the chalk dust, it also let the teacher use color markers, but the ink smelled awful. Then came the smart white board allowing the teachers even more creativity in presenting material if they have the time to figure out how to use them effectively. I could draw the same parallels with technology, the typewriter being just one example. The keyboard hasn't changed in recent history, you use the same fingers to hit the same keys, the words appear as the keys are hit. The difference is how much easier it is to fix a mistake, how much more creative you can be with a virtual piece of paper instead of an actual piece of paper.
So back to the question, What is the business of schools today? In my opinion it is: give students a solid base of learning so that they can live in our society. It includes the basics, reading, writing, arithmatic, and computers because everything runs on computers these days. And, OH, by the way, add some character and self-esteem building, drug, alcohol, health, sex, economics, money management, positive behavior, problem solving, and group work. Make sure the students are being fed, and well cared for at home. If something else goes wrong in society you can be sure it will be put on the schools to fix it. Cram all that stuff into 6 hours a day for 180 days. And just to make things interesting we'll give the students five years of living and growing before we start educating them.
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)